C: Paper and Referee Metadata
       Paper Number C537:
       Date: Received 23 July 2001 
       Paper Title: 	Mississippi Computational Web Portal
	 Author(s): 	Tomasz Haupt, Purushotham Bangalore, Gregory Henley 
       Referee: 		Gregor von Laszewski
       Address: 		gregor@mcs.anl.gov

Referee Recommendations. Please indicate overall recommendations here, and details in following sections.
       accepted provided changes suggested are made

D: Referee Comments (For Editor Only) ------------------------------------



E: Referee Comments (For Author and Editor)  ------------------------------


The paper needs to address the difference between Webflow and this activity. 

Can we disconnect and connect to the portal and have the jobs still running?

F: Presentation Changes

Summary:

	The paper describes THE …

Replace “this way” with Thus. I do not like the use of the phrase This way.

Introduction:

	The first two paragraphs are almost two introductions, maybe the first paragraph should be dropped? Maybe a better connection to the second should be established.

Page 2: section 2. this is yet a different motivating example. I suggest to either stick with one motivating example or have a special section that lists and goes in detail to each of the motivating examples. Recommendation tighten introduction and motivating examples.

Page 4. is the term actors used in the CS sense? This is unclear, if not explain what it is.

Figure 1. Use UML

Grid is almost always capitalized

Figures are unreadable, why does everyone scale gif images to unreadability?

Use vector graphics for figure 7.