Subject: CCPE Portal C533 From: "Mary Thomas" Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:17:58 -0700 To: "Geoffrey Fox" X-UIDL: d551878c0f0e0000 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Received: by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (mbox gcfpc) (with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.31 1998/05/13) Sun Oct 14 18:03:47 2001) X-From_: fox@mailer.csit.fsu.edu Sun Oct 14 18:03:26 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gcfpc@csit.fsu.edu Received: from dirac.csit.fsu.edu (dirac.csit.fsu.edu [144.174.128.44]) by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FA123A07 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:03:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by dirac.csit.fsu.edu (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7) id SAA27494; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:03:26 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Message-Id: <200110142203.SAA27494@dirac.csit.fsu.edu> Delivered-To: fox@csit.fsu.edu Received: from mask.uits.indiana.edu (mask.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.6.184]) by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7295523A12 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:18:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from relay.sdsc.edu (relay.sdsc.edu [132.249.20.66]) by mask.uits.indiana.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id f8T1FuM27363 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:15:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mthomastp (dhcp-65-102.sdsc.edu [132.249.65.102]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by relay.sdsc.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1/SDSCmx-6) with ESMTP id f8T1I4013763 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EXP1024-RC4-SHA (56 bits) verified NO) for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: mthomas@sdsc.edu Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Resent-To: Geoffrey Fox Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:03:25 -0400 Resent-From: Geoffrey Fox REFEREE'S REPORT Concurrency and Computation:Practice and Experience ********** C: Paper and Referee Metadata Paper Number Cnnn: C533 Date: 9-28-01 Paper Title: The ASCI Computational Grid: Initial Deployment Author(s): Randal Rheinheimer, Judy I. Beiriger, Hugh P. Bivens, Steven L. Humphreys Referee: Cathie Mills, Mary Thomas Address: mthomas@sdsc.edu Referee Recommendations. Please indicate overall recommendations here, and details in following sections. accepted provided changes suggested are made D: Referee Comments (For Editor Only): E: Referee Comments (For Author and Editor): This paper has a lot of good information but I found it hard to read. It would help to have it broken into smaller sections with more detail. F: Presentation Changes: Need some background information about the DRM project. section 2 paragraph 1 It should be made more clear that this is describing the level of the architecture closest to the machine. Figure 1 should be made more clear so that the user can clearly understand how the following fit in and how they depend on eachother. 1 - Production Wizard 2 - Workflow Manager 3 - Resource Broker 4 - Information Service 5 - Monitoring Service The terminology used in the text and on the figure should match. The information is good... and pertinent, but it needs to be longer and more detailed so that the reader can really understand what is being done. .