Replied: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 15:29:59 -0400 Replied: "David Jon Furbish" Return-Path: furbish@fsu.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: fox@csit.fsu.edu Received: from mask.uits.indiana.edu (mask.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.6.184]) by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2DE23A01 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from quartz.gly.fsu.edu (quartz.gly.fsu.edu [128.186.10.36]) by mask.uits.indiana.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id f91JDKk12568 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:13:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from Furbish (furbish.cespr.fsu.edu [146.201.214.15]) by quartz.gly.fsu.edu (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f91JAtt44876; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:10:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <019001c14aad$6d018ba0$0fd6c992@Furbish> From: "David Jon Furbish" To: "Jonathan Shewchuk" , "Robert Anderson" , "William Dietrich" , "James Syvitski" , "Tad Pfeffer" , "Chris Paola" , "Gary Parker" , "Vaughan Voller" , "Alan Howard" , "Patricia Wiberg" , "Rudy Slingerland" , "Greg Tucker" , "Geoffrey Fox" , "Mark Schmeeckle" , "M. Yousuff Hussaini" Subject: NSF panel summary Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:15:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_018D_01C14A8B.E34C9100" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_018D_01C14A8B.E34C9100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi - The Panel Summary (below) for the ITR 2 proposal was just released... David Panel Summary #1 PROPOSAL NO.: 0122483=20 PANEL SUMMARY: The panel ranks this proposal as competitive.=20 The general sense was that this was an ambitious proposal, with strong = intellectual merit. There was concern about whether this was too = ambitious, and about the proposed management. These and other concerns = are reflected in the individual reviews.=20 All unconflicted panelists have read and approved this summary.=20 PANEL RECOMMENDATION: Competitive ------=_NextPart_000_018D_01C14A8B.E34C9100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi -
 
The Panel Summary (below) for the ITR 2 = proposal=20 was just released...
 
David
 
 
 

Panel Summary #1

PROPOSAL=20 NO.: 0122483=20

PANEL SUMMARY:
The panel ranks this proposal as = competitive.=20

The general sense was that this was an ambitious proposal, with = strong=20 intellectual merit. There was concern about whether this was too = ambitious, and=20 about the proposed management. These and other concerns are reflected in = the=20 individual reviews.

All unconflicted panelists have read and = approved=20 this summary.



PANEL RECOMMENDATION:=20 Competitive

------=_NextPart_000_018D_01C14A8B.E34C9100--