Subject: JGFSI paper submission
Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 08:38:19 -0500
Resent-From: Geoffrey Fox <gcf@npac.syr.edu>
Resent-To: p_gcf@npac.syr.edu
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 16:29:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Tia Newhall <newhall@cs.swarthmore.edu>
To: gcf@npac.syr.edu
CC: Tia Newhall <newhall@cs.swarthmore.edu>

hi,

Attached is our final paper submission for JGFSI.

I've attached both a gziped postscript version of our paper and
a gziped tar file of our paper's laTex source files.  Also, included
below is a description of some of the referees comments that we
did not address and why we did not address them.

Please let me know if there is anything else I need to send you.

Thanks,
Tia

Information about referees suggestions that we did not address:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Many of referee #1's comments indicate that he missed the point of
our paper. In particular, his major complaints about our using a
simulated JIT compiler (we DON'T simulate JIT compilation, but
dynamic compilation) instead of a real one made it clear that he
did not understand the difference between JIT  compiled and
dynamically compiled executions.  I took this as an indication
that we did not clearly specify the difference between JIT compiled
executions and dynamically compiled executions and tried to make the
distinction even more clear in the final version of our paper.
Also, many of his minor comments were off point, so I only addressed
his comments that were relevant to our work.

Other than that I addressed each referees comments in the new
version of the paper.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Name: paper.ps.gz
   paper.ps.gz    Type: Postscript Document (application/postscript)
              Encoding: BASE64

                             Name: paper_latex_src.tar.gz
   paper_latex_src.tar.gz    Type: Unix Tape Archive (application/x-tar)
                         Encoding: BASE64