C351 Editor (note ONE more report)

Dear XYZ,
We enclose 3 referee reports on
C351:
The referees all agree that this is an interesting paper and we would like to publish 
it. The requested changes are minor except that one referee indicates that the detailed 
results are likely to improve significantly and would prefer to see more up to date results. 
We suggest you bear this in mind in the revised paper that we hope you can send us and 
which we can publish without further review. Possibly you can plan changes at the the 
proof copy stage if necessary (don't tell the publisher that we suggested this!) Please 
include a memo with your resubmission describing any changes.
We thank you for your interest in Concurrency: Practice and Experience

C353
Dear XYZ,
We enclose 2 referee reports on:
C353:
Although one referee recommends rejection, we would like to publish paper as it 
has clear practical implications. We would however like for you to address the referees' 
comments as far as possible. In particular the title and abstract need to be more precise 
and should in particular indicate more clearly that the paper addresses compiler 
transformations. We wonder if term "tiling" is universally understood in this context; 
"blocking" seems a more common term. We look forward to a revised paper which 
should include a memo describing your response to the referees.
We thank you for your interest in Concurrency: Practice and Experience

C354 and C356 Editorial Letters

Dear XYZ,
We enclose 2 referee reports on:
C354,6:
We regret that in view of the unenthusiastic evaluation, we are unable to publish 
this paper.
We thank you for your interest in Concurrency: Practice and Experience

To Editorial Board
Dear XYZ,
This is my occasional letter to the editorial board of Concurrency: Practice and 
Experience. I believe that the journal is doing quite well in an era that presents challenges 
to both journals and their publishers. Our success comes from the increasing relevance of 
its theme of practical concurrency, several excellent special issues and of course from the 
Editorial Board's help in suggesting referees and encouraging submission of good papers. 
To continue our progress, I have revised the "aims and goals" of our journal and enclose 
this for any suggested improvements. I took the liberty of using this new version with our 
June 97 special issue on "Java for Scientific Computing" but clearly further changes can 
easily be made.

Then continue in one of two ways
Given the broadening scope of the journal (with more networking and web based 
issues in particular), I believe we should add a few key people to the board and would 
welcome any suggestions in this and other areas of importance for Concurrency: Practice 
and Experience.
I thank you for your continued help in the journal and assume that you would like 
to remain on the board!

OR
I had noticed that your participation with the journal had been modest recently 
and wondered if you still wished to remain on the board! Please do tell me if you wish to 
continue (which I would be happy to happen) and if so, I look forward to your help in the 
future. What ideas do you have now!