1) NSF Education division people were very friendly although one needs to play by their 
rules and be sensitive to the type of people (coming from an educational background) 
involved in review process. The Fermilab and Nebraska groups seemed well 
positioned here.
2) The presentations indicated in general rather a low level of current (Web and 
commercial) technology expertise. The Utah group was exception here.
3) There appeared to some opportunities for innovative projects which could attract 
special funding sources
? Using distributed simulation and database technology to support the nice 
simATLAS concept
? Using collaboration technology to  provide electronic mentoring by experts as 
part of a web site
4) The physics community needs to be careful in its approach to fields such as education 
and computer science. They need to recognize that these other fields are quite 
advanced and one needs to collaborate accordingly
5) I note the organization of NCSA and UCSD NSF Supercomputer consortiums. These 
have education and outreach activities funded at a level of about 5% the overall 
budget. These activities involve scientists around the country with coordination at a 
central site. The Leadership is in fact not at central site. The EOT (education, 
outreach, and training) activities have special thrust efforts in K-12, undergraduate, 
graduate, and continuing education areas. There are universal access, minority and 
technology cross-cutting efforts.