Distance Education ITR Proposal Resources

Reviews of Preprosal

• Preamble on ITR Process
• Panel Summary with many important comments
• Review:1 Very Good --Very short but likes W3C
• Review:2 Very Good: Positive Comments
• Review:3 Fair: Complains that no novelty in either technoology or approach to curriculum
• Review:4 Good: thoughtful comments on need to design curriculum appropriately in an integrated fashion that addresses needs of target audience. Believes we should have a staged deployment plan
• Review:5 Excellent: Summarizes view of proposal by10 NSF criteria

Preproposal Material

• Official One Page for NSF
• Preproposal Text
• References Cited in Preprosal (not all explicit?)
• Budget Justification submitted to NSF

Local Copy of NSF 99-167 without some irrelevant images

Alpha Draft March 31 2000

• Word Document
• HTMLVersion
• Fox suggestions March 31 2000

Beta Draft April 8 2000

• Word Document
• HTMLVersion
• Administrative Things to do April 7 2000

Work in Progress

• Discussion at Tallahassee March 9 2000
• Discussion at Tallahassee March 10 2000
• Implementation Plan from Willie Brown March 17 2000
• Discussion at Tallahassee March 21 2000
• Collaborative University Model underlying proposal in Powerpoint or Image form
• Curriculum Model from Ian Douglas March 21 00
• Curriculum Standards comments from Nancy McCracken March 6 2000
• Synergistic Mathematics and continent of Africa projects from James Turner March 6 2000
• Proposed SURA Computational Science Intiative 1998 from Joe Thompson
• SURA Working Group from Joe Thompson March 3 2000