Data Services
Mission Services
NASA not giving discounts for incremental use of resources
Standards, frameworks, reference implementation

Goddard
	Mixed reception of GSFC Mission Ops rejuvenation

CSOC viewed as Houston not GSFC

Honeywell data links planned on basis of many new missions
Also Universal Space, LM
	Bad business!!!!!!


Move ACE from GSFC to Datalinks
Unnecessary requirements: ISO and Earned Value (performance tracking) add 15%
	Are needed in Human Space Flight
	Note Goddard built to support manned flight


Now opposite -- Aqua needs 99.1% and can't meet

100 PLSA's
Need data on pricing of competition

Investments not possible as no commitment on legacy missions

Level playing field
Investment motivation
Fixed costs versus variable costs

Direct to S&Y codes for mission services

Dalton SOMO
Code O used to have enough money to fund operations
SOMO replaced Code O function
Code S got given dollars from SOMO for this

IMOC was neither center nor an architecture
	logically integrated; physically distributed
	No good business case

Need a bridge to future from legacy based past

SOMO goal is to help PI
CSOC goal is to amke CSOC effective

PI's must go to CSOC for a quote
Can choose cheapest for NASA or Enterprise

Data services are really fixed
Mission Services are variable -- people are specific to mission services

Fixed Costs are a real problem as need to recognize fixed but
have an incentive to reduce

NASA Centers get their part of SOMO budget directly -- 
Code S funds AMMOS
SOMO funds network

JPL just optimization issues
JSC are data distribution related
Goddard major issues

$50M IOA dollars at start contract removed by NASA