1) If you are allowed to amend a claim, why cannot you
   sign a claim saying it should be amended?
2) I do think that Dichiara submitted claim in good faith in August
   Unless he is very devious, Marek did not know claim had been filed
   as it meant in without claims he considers key
3) What is nature of process? 
   As lead inventor (by Marek's recent email and Technology disclosure)
   Do I have any rights to review/object to material submitted e.g. amendments
   What aspect of PTO process protects me
4) What is goal of Dichiara? Are they trying to stop my amendments or is it that
   they cannot amend until forms signed? Why did he not reply to my queries?
   Are they trying to patent and lock up ideas?
   Do they object to my claimed inventors or just too lazy to add? 
   Is there some funny rule that cannot amend until sign -- this does
   not seem very plausible.
5) Why are forms testifying to truth of claim, if all they are doing is
   testifying to the obvious. Namely Syracuse owns everything?
6) As Dichiara has attacked me, how can we negotiate in the future. It seems
   to me that this has broken trust that seems necessary.
7) Why is nobody addressing my questions on patent
   Sent to Dichiara/Carey/Ware January 18-19 and part of formal letter
   to University Strickland sent later
8) Why does timing matter, given claim of Marek (and me) that key claims are
   very recent work and in fact not obviously all reduced to practice
9) How important is reduced to practice issue