So it has been pointed out that the white paper would be strengthened
if we described the "real work" (i.e. curriculum development) in more detail.
This is true but I don't think we can just take the material in its current form
(see sections on web page http://www.npac.syr.edu/users/gcf/physicsedinit)
because they are not integrated. I think proposal would be much stronger if
we could organize projects in to one or two major thrusts that linked
theory and experiment, physics and engineering
For instance, I could imagine a "EtherWeb" or "Portal into Radiation"  or something
where we linked radiation experiments with theory; we compared contents of the "ether"
from fluid flow to radiation to gravity waves. We studied the mechanics of building
space stations to withstand radiation bursts; we studied condensed matter of solar cells
to trap radiation . We enlived this with a shuttle trip through these gaseous forms.
We dodged oscillating neutrinos and cosmic rays .....
All with Java applets, Universal access and Collaboration technologies .....
Taught in Phy 105, Egy ?? and the high schools around the world ....
This is half baked but maybe somebody who remembers some physics can find an attractive
and more technically accurate unifying theme. Then we would need to capture these
one or two thrusts into at most a page.
Help Please! ................................