Forwarded: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:04:51 -0500 Forwarded: Sung-Hoon Ko Return-Path: hubert@uet.e-technik.uni-kassel.de Delivery-Date: Fri Apr 26 11:40:31 2002 Return-Path: Received: from eldorado.uits.indiana.edu (eldorado.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.70]) by grids.ucs.indiana.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g3QGeUk02252 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:40:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from uet.e-technik.uni-kassel.de (uet-pc2.uet.e-technik.uni-kassel.de [141.51.112.42]) by eldorado.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id g3Q9OgeW025845 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 04:24:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from uet-ws3.uet.e-technik.uni-kassel.de (uet-ws3.uet.e-technik.uni-kassel.de [141.51.114.7]) by uet.e-technik.uni-kassel.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA07431; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:27:44 +0200 Received: from uetpc180 (uet-pc180 [141.51.114.180]) by uet-ws3.uet.e-technik.uni-kassel.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA05204; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:24:33 +0200 (MEST) From: "Hubert Lauer" To: Cc: "Langendoerfer, Peter" Subject: Review of IC 2002 paper #109 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:20:54 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1ED14.6E3AA330" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Content-Length: 5415 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1ED14.6E3AA330 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0013_01C1ED14.6E3AA330" ------=_NextPart_001_0013_01C1ED14.6E3AA330 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo, see your review attached. IC'02 conference team ------=_NextPart_001_0013_01C1ED14.6E3AA330 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hallo,

see = your review=20 attached.

IC'02 = conference=20 team

------=_NextPart_001_0013_01C1ED14.6E3AA330-- ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1ED14.6E3AA330 Content-Type: text/plain; name="review_1091.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="review_1091.txt" =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 WWIC02 Reviews for Paper #109 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 Title: Integration of Hand-Held Devices into Collaborative Environments Authors: Geoffrey Fox, Sung-Hoon Ko, Kangseok Kim, Sangyoon Oh, Sangmi = Lee =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 REVIEWER #1 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 Numerical Scores: appropriateness: 5 originality: 3 tech_strength: 3 presentation: 4 overall: 3 Comments: The paper is well presented, but some major parts are missing. = Relations to other works in thus field are NOT provided, no outlook or = plan for future work is given. The idea itself and the approach is well defined and a good strategie. It is unclear if it is worth to be published. To make a "poster" = presentation would be a good idea. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D REVIEWER #2 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 Numerical Scores: appropriateness: 5 originality: 4 tech_strength: 4 presentation: 3 overall: 4 Comments: Nice paper I would be interested in more information on the flow of messages, = possible event rates for both the GMS and GMSEE =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D REVIEWER #3 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 Numerical Scores: appropriateness: 2 originality: 2 tech_strength: 2 presentation: 4 overall: 2 Comments: The paper is presented in the form of a research report and has some = incomplete parts. As such, it is very interesting although it does not = fit well with the focus of WWIC. The strength of the paper is that it = attempts to tackle a rather difficult problem, indeed with an event = model that appears to be adequate for collaborative environments and = PDAs. Although the architectural components appear to be mostly in place, the = results section cannot provide supportive evidence about the system's = efficiency. However, both the description and the preliminary results justify = acceptance as a research report. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1ED14.6E3AA330--