Replied: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:37:22 -0500 Replied: "Dunn, Jon Michael" Return-Path: dunn@indiana.edu Delivery-Date: Mon Sep 23 18:29:05 2002 Return-Path: Received: from julesburg.uits.indiana.edu (julesburg.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.75]) by grids.ucs.indiana.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g8NNT5m05789 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:29:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from iu-mssg-smtp04.ads.iu.edu (iu-mssg-smtp04.exchange.iu.edu [129.79.1.223]) by julesburg.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id g8NNT9eP003230; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:29:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from iu-mssg-mbx08.ads.iu.edu ([129.79.1.217]) by iu-mssg-smtp04.ads.iu.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:29:11 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C26359.04C2D36C" Subject: Informatics Priorities for Campus Strategic Plan -- Please! Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:29:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Informatics Priorities for Campus Strategic Plan -- Please! Thread-Index: AcJKDWiVPh6XgG4dROyOMI5mcW5DHwZSc8gg From: "Dunn, Jon Michael" To: "Elliot, Wendy L" , "Wyss, Catharine" , "Aspray, William" , "Blevis, Eli B." , "Dalkilic, Mehmet M." , "Ekbia, Hamid" , "Erbach, David W." , "Groth, Dennis" , "Haghverdi, Esfandiar" , "Kim, Sun" , "Mostafa, Javed" , "Ogan, Christine L." , "Paolillo, John C." , "Robertson, Edward L." , "HCID" , "Wiggins, Gary D." , "Fox, Geoffrey C." Cc: "Isaacson, Eric" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2002 23:29:11.0343 (UTC) FILETIME=[056353F0:01C26359] Content-Length: 5040 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C26359.04C2D36C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is a reminder that for any of you working on ideas to include in priorities, that I need them essentially now (actually yesterday) if I am to work them into a document to be submitted by Oct. 1 as the chancellor has requested. As I said at our faculty meeting, I know this is an extremely tight timeline, but that is what we have been given. The chancellor needs these priorities then so as to feed them to the committee she is creating so as to give the committee time enough to request proposals of the schools based on their selection from these priorities. She wants to use the proposals as the basis for funding decisions for the next academic year. Remember there is real money on the table because of the extra $1000 tuition charged each freshman beginning next fall. We need to make cases for some of it. =20 All I need is a 1 page (at most) description of the kinds of things we discussed at the faculty meeting, or that I have talked to some of you individually about who were not at the meeting. A good idea, why the time is right, why we are in a good position to do it, how it will make a definite improvement in academic quality (especially as judged externally), and what funding opportunities it might open (if there are some). =20 Thanks. =20 --Mike =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C26359.04C2D36C Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is a reminder that for any of = you working on ideas to include in priorities, that I need them essentially = now (actually yesterday) if I am to work them into a document to be submitted by Oct. = 1 as the chancellor has requested. As I said at our faculty meeting, I know = this is an extremely tight timeline, but that is what we have been given. The chancellor needs these priorities then so as to feed them to the = committee she is creating so as to give the committee time enough to request proposals = of the schools based on their selection from these priorities. She wants to use = the proposals as the basis for funding decisions for the next academic year. Remember there is real money on the table because of the extra $1000 = tuition charged each freshman beginning next fall. We need to make cases for = some of it.

All I need is a 1 page (at most) description of the kinds of things we discussed at the faculty meeting, = or that I have talked to some of you individually about who were not at the = meeting. A good idea, why the time is right, why we are in a good position to do = it, how it will make a definite improvement in academic quality (especially as = judged externally), and what funding opportunities it might open (if there are = some).

Thanks.

--Mike

=00 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C26359.04C2D36C--