Reply-to: Geoffrey Fox To: Sung-Hoon Ko Subject: We were approved for RR track Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:04:51 -0500 From: Geoffrey Fox Please note comments Marshall troops on a) References b) Performance Thanks Geoffrey Fox gcf@indiana.edu FAX 8128567972 Phones Cell 315-254-6387 Home 8123239196 Lab 8128567977 CS 8128553788 ------- Forwarded Message Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:20:54 +0200 From: "Hubert Lauer" To: cc: "Langendoerfer, Peter" Subject: Review of IC 2002 paper #109 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1ED14.6E3AA330 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0013_01C1ED14.6E3AA330" - ------=_NextPart_001_0013_01C1ED14.6E3AA330 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hallo, see your review attached. IC'02 conference team - ------=_NextPart_001_0013_01C1ED14.6E3AA330 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hallo,

see = your review=20 attached.

IC'02 = conference=20 team

- ------=_NextPart_001_0013_01C1ED14.6E3AA330-- - ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1ED14.6E3AA330 Content-Type: text/plain; name="review_1091.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="review_1091.txt" =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 WWIC02 Reviews for Paper #109 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 Title: Integration of Hand-Held Devices into Collaborative Environments Authors: Geoffrey Fox, Sung-Hoon Ko, Kangseok Kim, Sangyoon Oh, Sangmi = Lee =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 REVIEWER #1 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 Numerical Scores: appropriateness: 5 originality: 3 tech_strength: 3 presentation: 4 overall: 3 Comments: The paper is well presented, but some major parts are missing. = Relations to other works in thus field are NOT provided, no outlook or = plan for future work is given. The idea itself and the approach is well defined and a good strategie. It is unclear if it is worth to be published. To make a "poster" = presentation would be a good idea. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D REVIEWER #2 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 Numerical Scores: appropriateness: 5 originality: 4 tech_strength: 4 presentation: 3 overall: 4 Comments: Nice paper I would be interested in more information on the flow of messages, = possible event rates for both the GMS and GMSEE =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D REVIEWER #3 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=20 Numerical Scores: appropriateness: 2 originality: 2 tech_strength: 2 presentation: 4 overall: 2 Comments: The paper is presented in the form of a research report and has some = incomplete parts. As such, it is very interesting although it does not = fit well with the focus of WWIC. The strength of the paper is that it = attempts to tackle a rather difficult problem, indeed with an event = model that appears to be adequate for collaborative environments and = PDAs. Although the architectural components appear to be mostly in place, the = results section cannot provide supportive evidence about the system's = efficiency. However, both the description and the preliminary results justify = acceptance as a research report. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D - ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C1ED14.6E3AA330-- ------- End of Forwarded Message