Replied: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 18:37:04 -0500 Replied: "Klabunde, Charles" Return-Path: charles.klabunde@boeing.com Delivery-Date: Sun Jun 9 12:11:55 2002 Return-Path: Received: from round.uits.indiana.edu (round.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.72]) by grids.ucs.indiana.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g59HBtu06056 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 12:11:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from stl-smtpout-01.boeing.com (stl-smtpout-01.boeing.com [12.13.247.21]) by round.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id g59HCujR009705; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 12:12:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from blv-av-02.boeing.com ([192.54.3.92]) by stl-smtpout-01.boeing.com (8.9.2/8.8.5-M2) with ESMTP id MAA27511; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 12:12:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from blv-hub-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blv-av-02.boeing.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/MBS-AV-01) with ESMTP id KAA12392; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xch-nwbh-02.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwbh-02.nw.nos.boeing.com [192.54.12.28]) by blv-hub-01.boeing.com (8.11.3/8.11.3/MBS-LDAP-01) with ESMTP id g59HCsH03210; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by xch-nwbh-02.nw.nos.boeing.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:12:54 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Klabunde, Charles" To: "Adams, Thomas L" , "Anderson, Michael W" , Dennis Gannon , "Garlow, Carl P" , Geoffrey C Fox , Gloria Mark , Keith R Jackson , "Retallack, Don" , Walt Scacchi Cc: "Nielsen, Brian C" Subject: Proposal on BAA 02-09 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 10:12:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C20FD8.E3DBAFC8" Content-Length: 3294 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C20FD8.E3DBAFC8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I have the response for DARPA on our proposal to the DARPA IPTO proposal and we were judged as "not-selectable and thus cannot be considered for funding." For those of you who were not at the NCSA meeting in May, the rumor there is that the winners are all hardware companies (IBM, HP, SGI, Cray, and Sun), and that the real objective of the proposal was the construction of a new generation of supercomputer. To my knowledge, the winners have still not been announced, however. Thanks for all the work you put in on this. We will continue to look for appropriate funding opportunities in the area of high performance computing and if anything appropriate comes up, I'll will let you know. If you have any questions, please write. Chuck Klabunde Manager Platform Computing Program Boeing Phantom Works (425) 865-3364 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C20FD8.E3DBAFC8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"

I have the response for DARPA on our proposal to the DARPA IPTO proposal and we were judged as "not-selectable and thus cannot be considered for funding."

For those of you who were not at the NCSA meeting in May, the rumor there is that the winners are all hardware companies (IBM, HP, SGI, Cray, and Sun), and that the real objective of the proposal was the construction of a new generation of supercomputer. To my knowledge, the winners have still not been announced, however.

Thanks for all the work you put in on this. We will continue to look for appropriate funding opportunities in the area of high performance computing and if anything appropriate comes up, I'll will let you know.

If you have any questions, please write.

Chuck Klabunde
Manager
Platform Computing Program
Boeing Phantom Works
(425) 865-3364

------_=_NextPart_001_01C20FD8.E3DBAFC8--