Replied: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 02:58:52 -0500 Replied: "Shrideep Pallickara" Return-Path: spallick@indiana.edu Delivery-Date: Wed Mar 5 02:01:29 2003 Return-Path: Received: from rockridge.uits.indiana.edu (rockridge.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.74]) by grids.ucs.indiana.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h2571TC29902 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:01:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from logchain.uits.indiana.edu (logchain.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.77]) by rockridge.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.8/8.12.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id h2574ITS009275 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:04:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from ptllaptop1 (d-141-174.dhcp-149-159.indiana.edu [149.159.141.174]) by logchain.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.8/8.12.1/IUPO) with SMTP id h25748SV009733 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:04:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <002101c2e2e5$690ad160$ae8d9f95@ptllaptop1> From: "Shrideep Pallickara" To: References: <047201c2e2da$2fe79810$2d68389c@deccan> <3E659141.4060108@grids.ucs.indiana.edu> <047c01c2e2dd$19394a70$2d68389c@deccan> <3E659DDA.6080200@grids.ucs.indiana.edu> Subject: Anabas/NB Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:04:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001E_01C2E2BB.7F78CC60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Length: 6583 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C2E2BB.7F78CC60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My tests with Anabas have looked quite good so far. I have tested using = clients from Windows 2000 Server and Professional, and also Windows XP. = Multiple joins and leaves were also tested on a session that ran for = 7h59mins.=20 I'll let you know how the seminar goes. Hopefully, there should be no = glitches. I plan to login and out several times during the session.=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Geoffrey Fox=20 To: Shrideep Pallickara=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:48 AM Subject: Re: Perf Paper Good Shrideep Pallickara wrote: I agree ... "Performance Monitoring" of performance aggregation = overheads sound a bit funny. I included the word "Portal" in your suggested title since we are also including XSL Transformation times. So the section is now called "Monitoring and Portal Overheads". Is this fine. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoffrey Fox" To: "Shrideep Pallickara" Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:55 AM Subject: Re: Perf Paper I think the discussion on performance is confusing as its performance = of performance module I suggest renaming it "Monitoring Overhead" Shrideep Pallickara wrote: Gurhan just forwarded me a mail from you. I didn't receive your = comments for some reason. The address is fine in the e-mail. I have incorporated your suggestions into the Introduction (6th paragraph) and the Conclusion (final paragraph). Should I move details from the added paragraph to somewhere earlier. Can we go ahead and submit it, if you are OK with the changes made. http://www.naradabrokering.org/papers/Portal-PAS.pdf Shrideep -- : : Geoffrey Fox gcf@indiana.edu FAX 8128567972 : Phones Cell 315-254-6387 Home 8123239196 Lab 8128567977 CS 8128553788 =20 =20 --=20 : : Geoffrey Fox gcf@indiana.edu FAX 8128567972 : Phones Cell 315-254-6387 Home 8123239196 Lab 8128567977 CS 8128553788 ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C2E2BB.7F78CC60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My tests with Anabas have looked quite good so far. = I have=20 tested using clients from Windows 2000 Server and Professional, and also = Windows=20 XP. Multiple joins and leaves were also tested on a session that ran for = 7h59mins.

I'll let you know how the seminar goes. = Hopefully, there=20 should be no glitches. I plan to login and out several times during the=20 session.

----- Original Message -----

From:=20 Geoffrey Fox

To: Shrideep Pallickara

Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 = 1:48=20 AM

Subject: Re: Perf Paper

Good

Shrideep Pallickara wrote:

I agree ... "Performance Monitoring" of =
performance aggregation overheads
sound a bit funny.

I included the word "Portal" in your suggested title since we are also
including XSL Transformation times.
So the section is now called "Monitoring and Portal Overheads".

Is this fine.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoffrey Fox" <gcf@grids.ucs.indiana.edu&g=
t;
To: "Shrideep Pallickara" <spallick@indiana.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:55 AM
Subject: Re: Perf Paper

I think the discussion on =
performance is confusing as its performance of
performance module
I suggest renaming it "Monitoring Overhead"

Shrideep Pallickara wrote:

Gurhan just forwarded me =
a mail from you. I didn't receive your comments

for

some reason.
The address is fine in  the e-mail.

I have incorporated your suggestions into the Introduction (6th

paragraph)

and the Conclusion (final =
paragraph). Should I move details from the

added

paragraph to somewhere =
earlier.

Can we go ahead and submit it, if you are OK with the changes made.

http://www.=
naradabrokering.org/papers/Portal-PAS.pdf

Shrideep

--
:
: Geoffrey Fox  gcf@indiana.edu FAX 8128567972
: Phones Cell 315-254-6387 Home 8123239196 Lab 8128567977 CS 8128553788

--=20
:
: Geoffrey Fox  gcf@indiana.edu FAX 8128567972
: Phones Cell 315-254-6387 Home 8123239196 Lab 8128567977 CS =
8128553788

------=_NextPart_000_001E_01C2E2BB.7F78CC60--