Forwarded: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:05:54 -0400 Forwarded: John Yin Return-Path: msen@anabas.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: fox@csit.fsu.edu Received: from janus.hosting4u.net (janus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.37]) by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 195B323A1D for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:38:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 30396 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2001 21:38:05 -0000 Received: from capricornus.hosting4u.net (HELO anabas.com) (209.15.2.36) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 21:38:05 -0000 Received: from hizmet ([66.47.65.114]) by anabas.com ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:38:02 -0500 Message-ID: <008301c0fe88$3a088c60$9865fea9@hizmet> From: "mehmet sen" To: Subject: one issue Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:37:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0080_01C0FE4D.8D0955B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0080_01C0FE4D.8D0955B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Sir, I observed strange things here. In May, I am assigned to make the XML = project which is supposed to be functionally same as the current Anabas = product. Couple of times it is deferred to prepare demos. I always = confused with real deadline. Finally, we finished it with Ozgur, and it = needs QA testing and shipping after that.=20 However, now I am told this Monday that this effort was not for = production, it will be adapted for LMS system. Normally, this is fine, = but I lost my time in wrong direction. I wanted and could learn schema tools and development in practice by = Ozgur, which we need now. We could develop course schemas and = architecture together.=20 More importantly, I could work last couple weeks on new architecture = designs, I just tried to finalize programs for real environments. I = could not find time to research architecture issues even after our = online discussions. Only yesterday I gave them architecture ideas. = Luckily we discussed with Ozgur almost all the off-line time about = architectural pictures. I could give better directions during the past = for the current targeted project, which was kind of independent from me. = I believe that it would be better if I would know the company targets = better, and changes at a reasonable time. Best regards, Mehmet P.S. When I told this to John, he reminded me a conversation of us, = which we did for LMS on GXOS. However, this conversation did not include = canceling of current product development. I did not make any argument = after this to be positive. ------=_NextPart_000_0080_01C0FE4D.8D0955B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Sir,
 
I observed strange things here. In May, = I am=20 assigned to make the XML project which is supposed to be functionally = same as=20 the current Anabas product. Couple of times it is deferred to prepare = demos. I=20 always confused with real deadline. Finally, we finished it with Ozgur, = and it=20 needs QA testing and shipping after that.
However, now I am told = this Monday=20 that this effort was not for production, it will be adapted for LMS = system.=20 Normally, this is fine, but I lost my time in wrong = direction.
 I wanted=20 and could learn schema tools and development in practice by Ozgur, which = we need=20 now. We could develop course schemas and architecture together. =
 More=20 importantly, I could work last couple weeks on new architecture designs, = I just=20 tried to finalize programs for real environments. I could not find time = to=20 research architecture issues even after our online discussions. Only = yesterday I=20 gave them architecture ideas. Luckily we discussed with Ozgur almost all = the=20 off-line time about architectural pictures. I could give better = directions=20 during the past for the current targeted project, which was kind of = independent=20 from me.
 
I believe that it would be better if I = would know=20 the company targets better, and changes at a reasonable = time.
 
Best regards,
Mehmet
 
P.S. When I told this to John, he = reminded me a=20 conversation of us, which we did for LMS on GXOS. However, this = conversation did=20 not include canceling of current product development. I did not make any = argument after this to be positive.
------=_NextPart_000_0080_01C0FE4D.8D0955B0--