Subject:
CPE Paper -- C499: Data Movement and Control Substrate
From:
"Nikos P. Chrisochoides" <nikos@CS.WM.EDU>
Date:
Sun, 28 Oct 2001 13:41:06 -0500
To:
gcf@cs.indiana.edu
CC:
nikos@CS.WM.EDU
X-UIDL:
841d3dab93dd0c00
X-Mozilla-Status:
0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
00000000
Received:
by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (mbox gcfpc) (with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.31 1998/05/13) Sun Oct 28 14:23:57 2001)
X-From_:
gcf@cs.indiana.edu Sun Oct 28 14:17:20 2001
Return-Path:
<gcf@cs.indiana.edu>
Delivered-To:
gcfpc@csit.fsu.edu
Received:
from moose.cs.indiana.edu (moose.cs.indiana.edu [129.79.254.191]) by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBF523A19; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 14:17:15 -0500 (EST)
Received:
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moose.cs.indiana.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6/IUCS_2.43) with ESMTP id f9SJHEu02812; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 14:17:15 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Message-Id:
<200110281917.f9SJHEu02812@moose.cs.indiana.edu>
Received:
from va.cs.wm.edu (va.cs.wm.edu [128.239.2.31]) by moose.cs.indiana.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6/IUCS_2.43) with ESMTP id f9SIfGu01676 for <gcf@cs.indiana.edu>; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 13:41:17 -0500 (EST)
Received:
from in.cs.wm.edu (in [128.239.2.21]) by va.cs.wm.edu (8.11.4/8.9.1) with ESMTP id f9SIdqq09340; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 13:39:52 -0500 (EST)
Received:
from in (nikos@localhost) by in.cs.wm.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id f9SIf8T27363; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 13:41:08 -0500
Message-Id:
<200110281841.f9SIf8T27363@in.cs.wm.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning:
in.cs.wm.edu: nikos owned process doing -bs
X-Mailer:
exmh version 2.5 07/16/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed ; boundary="==_Exmh_-19497289920"
Resent-To:
Geoffrey Fox <gcfpc@csit.fsu.edu>, Geoffrey Fox <fox@csit.fsu.edu>
Resent-Date:
Sun, 28 Oct 2001 14:17:14 -0500
Resent-From:
Geoffrey Fox <gcf@cs.indiana.edu>

Dear Geoffrey,

I append the final version (in pdf) of the CPE paper #C499. 

We (Keshav and I) have almost re-wrote the paper and 
addressed all the suggestions and recommendations made 
by the referees.

Specifically we:

(1)  explained much better and strengthened the justification of
     the DMCS system 
     ---main concern of the Referee #1,

(2) improved  the performance  evaluation section by  
    modifying some  of the  tables and adding couple  
    of graphs that better explain  the overheads introduced by 
    DMCS especially  on the receive side
    ---suggestion made by Referee #2

(3) updated some of the  references and added  missing references
    from recent  and active related projects
    ---recommendation made by all three Referees

As the result the presentation of the paper is much better and the
size of the paper has been reduced from 31 pages to 26 pages. 

Please download from:
     http://www.cs.wm.edu/~nikos/nikos_cpe_c499.tar.gz

a tar-file with the latex file and all related figures.

Thank you very much,

Nikos

-- Prof. Nikos P. Chrisochoides Phone: (757) 221-3466 Computer Science Dept. URL: http://www.cs.wm.edu/~nikos Parallel Experimental Systems Lab URL: http://www.cs.wm.edu/pes/ College of William and Mary Email: nikos@cs.wm.edu