Subject: Re: Reviewing Portal Contributions From: Chip Watson Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:44:34 -0400 To: fox@csit.fsu.edu X-UIDL: 2be5c3aca90e0000 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Received: by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (mbox gcfpc) (with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.31 1998/05/13) Sun Oct 14 18:03:41 2001) X-From_: fox@mailer.csit.fsu.edu Sun Oct 14 18:03:10 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gcfpc@csit.fsu.edu Received: from dirac.csit.fsu.edu (dirac.csit.fsu.edu [144.174.128.44]) by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A77A23A07 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:03:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost by dirac.csit.fsu.edu (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7) id SAA17676; Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:03:09 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Message-Id: <200110142203.SAA17676@dirac.csit.fsu.edu> Delivered-To: fox@csit.fsu.edu Received: from ccs5.jlab.org (ftp2.jlab.org [129.57.35.124]) by mailer.csit.fsu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39F223A07 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jlab.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs5.jlab.org (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f8QFjrO12403 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3BB1F7E2.814857AF@jlab.org> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3B844B51.2080607@csit.fsu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-To: Geoffrey Fox Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:03:09 -0400 Resent-From: Geoffrey Fox C: Paper and Referee Metadata Paper Number Cnnn: C543 Date: Sept 26, 2001 Paper Title: The Gateway Computational Web Portal Author(s): Marlon E. Pierce, Choonhan Youn, Geoffrey C. Fox Referee: William (Chip) Watson Address: 12000 Jefferson Av., Newport News, VA 23606 Referee Recommendations. Please indicate overall recommendations here, and details in following sections. X publish as is (assuming formatting problems are fixed) accepted provided changes suggested are made reject D: Referee Comments (For Editor Only) ------------------------------------ A good paper, although a bit long. References border on excessive. Not all figures add to the narrative. Recommendation to editor: while no page limit was specified, guidance on range of page counts expected could have improved balance within this issue, and encouraged tighter writing for longer papers, and encouraged more detail in shorter papers. E: Referee Comments (For Author and Editor) ------------------------------ Technical content is good, reasonable clear discussion of Kerberos and CORBA issues and architecture. One unanswered question in my mind is why the Charon solution was kept when the SSL solution is so much cleaner. If there was a problem with the SSL solution (either technical or adminsistrative) it should have been covered. F: Presentation Changes There are a number of formatting problems with this paper, which exist in the PDF file, but may not exist in the source file. Problems include: insufficient space between line at top and text missing footnote markers for institutions in title section heading misplaced on page 10 near bottom (overlays text) screen images are at too low a resolution -- Chip Watson High Performance Computing Group Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Tel: (757) 269-7101 http://www.jlab.org/~watson .