Referee 1 ****************************************************************

Referee Recommendations. accepted provided changes suggested are made


E: Referee Comments (For Author and Editor):

The paper discusses application of a framework Web enabling legacy applications.
It gives good story of how system is being implemented. The authors should
consider including "Experience" Section that discusses simulation work using
non-web and web system. Discuss limitations and advantages of both approaches.
No just once you make webenabled you can access it from everywhere. Think in terms
ease with one can use the application and quickly do their work. Also discuss
about complexity of development. Since such systems need to be on Webserver,
what about performance if too many users want to use it. Any thought on
running application on clusters and provide application level salability measures.

F: Presentation Changes

As suggested above: particularly experience, scalability, and performance issues.

Referee 2 ****************************************************************

See referee 4 of C521 -- Your first paperr.it [146.48.65.89]) by snorkel.uits.indiana.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/IUPO) with ESMTP id f9F8e4B05889 for <gcf@indiana.edu>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 03:40:05 -0500 (EST)