8/21/00
IMS ADL IEEE LTSC Aug 21 2000
25
Omissions I
•Grade and other Performance data – IEEE LTSC was considering this 3 years ago
•Interoperable Services
– Chat Room to Bulletin Board, File Manipulation
•Requirements of IMS
gotten from small user survey and not from analysis of packages such as Web CT WebMC etc.
–Historically IMS
was most interested in building a system
•No analysis (I
could see) of modern
Internet technology, hand-held devices etc. to see range of architectures
–CMI from AICC comes
from the past
–W3C has hierarchial
DOM which could describe Content – ignored
by SCORM and IMS
•No agent (for tutoring) Interface