FRONTIERS'99 REVIEWER'S REPORT

_________________________________________________________________________

   Paper Number:

   Paper Title:

   Reviewer Name:

   Reviewer Email: 

   PC Member Name (if different):

_________________________________________________________________________

   Ranking (4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor):

   Originality:                       _______

   Technical Soundness:               _______

   Significance of the Work:          _______

   Quality of Presentation:           _______


_________________________________________________________________________

   Recommended action for paper (choose one option):

      (  ) Acceptable for presentation at FRONTIERS'99
      (  ) Marginally acceptable for presentation at FRONTIERS'99
      (  ) Not acceptable for presentation at FRONTIERS'99

_________________________________________________________________________

   Comments to the Author(s):






_________________________________________________________________________

   Confidential comments to the program committee: