Basic HTML version of Foils prepared July 4 98

Foil 12 HLA/RTI versus HPF/MPI

From HPcc from HLA/WebFlow/JWORB Perspective Madison Wisconsin Internet server Performance Meeting and Sandia Review Albuquerque -- June 23 and 24 1998. by Geoffrey C. Fox, Wojtek Furmanski


We can support any given paradigm at either high functionality (web server) or high performance (backend) level
HPCC Messaging could be a Java/RMI middle tier MPI or Nexus/Optimized Machine specific MPI at backend
JWORB supports CORBA based RTI already and we can bridge to high performance event driven simulation systems like SPEEDES at the high performance backend layer
However most problems can be thought of a set of coarse grain entities which are internally data parallel but the coarse grain structure is "functional" parallelism
So HLA/RTI is especially natural as tier 2 management level of these coarse entities
Entities can be time synchronized simulations and use MPI(HPF?) at either middle or back end tier or in fact as in DMSO simulations a federate running a custom discrete event simulation



© Northeast Parallel Architectures Center, Syracuse University, npac@npac.syr.edu

If you have any comments about this server, send e-mail to webmaster@npac.syr.edu.

Page produced by wwwfoil on Sat Jul 4 1998