Useful proof techniques
Doing your cs423 homework, it's often hard to decide which proof technique
to use. Here are a few pointers.
Proofs
- Proof by example:
The author gives only the case n = 2 and suggests that
it contains most of the ideas of the general proof.
- Proof by intimidation:
"Trivial."
- Proof by vigorous handwaving:
Works well in a classroom or seminar setting.
- Proof by cumbersome notation:
Best done with access to at least four alphabets
of special symbols.
- Proof by exhaustion:
An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof is
useful.
- Proof by omission:
"The reader may easily supply the details."
"The other 253 cases are analogous."
"..."
- Proof by obfuscation:
A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless
syntactically related statements.
- Proof by wishful citation:
The author cites the negation, converse, or generalization
of a theorem from literature to support his claims.
- Proof by funding:
How could three different government agencies be wrong?
- Proof by eminent authority:
"I saw Yao in the elevator and he said it was probably
NP-complete."
- Proof by personal communication:
"Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete
[Yao, personal communication]."
- Proof by reduction to the wrong problem:
"To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping
is decidable, we reduce it to the halting problem."
- Proof by reference to inaccessible literature:
The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem to be
found in a privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian
Philological Society, 1883.
- Proof by importance:
A large body of useful consequences all follow from the
proposition in question.
- Proof by accumulated evidence:
Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample.
- Proof by cosmology:
The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless.
Popular for proofs of the existence of God.
- Proof by mutual reference:
In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in
reference B, which is shown from Corollary 6.2 in reference C,
which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A.
- Proof by metaproof:
A method is given to construct the desired proof. The
correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques.
- Proof by vehement assertion:
It is useful to have some kind of authority in relation to
the audience.
- Proof by ghost reference:
Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem appears
in the reference given.
- Proof by forward reference:
Reference is usually to a forthcoming paper of the author,
which is often not as forthcoming as at first.
- Proof by appeal to intuition:
Cloud-shaped drawings frequently help here.
Access count:
Patrick Min, CS Department, Princeton University
Last modified: Sun Mar 3 00:03:28 1996