Subject: Re: tof77

From: Zheng Gengbin <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 09:28:00 +0800 (EAT)

On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Guansong Zhang wrote:

> On Apr 2, 10:21am, Zheng Gengbin wrote:
> >
> > 	Shi Lixia is responsible tof77 . Our strategy is to translate f90
> > statement to standard f77 . She have finished the variable declaration
> > statemnt and allocate statement .  We have not think about the unparse
> > problem . As I think , we can add some new standard f77 statement variant
> > in tags , and tell unparser to unparse it like f77 standard .
> >
> 
> Another option may be let unparse accept a flag which indicate f77 or f90
> results are perfered.
> 
> If f77 is perferred, things like :: and program name after END will be omitted.
> and when a statement unique to f90 is met, giving out an error message.
> 
> If f90 is perferred, just doing things in the old way.
> 
> This may a little easier than define another set of tags for f77.
> 

	I agree with you . Then who will do the work ?

Zheng