FutureGrid Cloud Metric FutureGrid

Cloud Metric

Table Of Contents

Previous topic

Summary Report (All)

Next topic

Usage Report india

This Page

Usage Report sierra

  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Hostname: sierra.futuregrid.org
  • Services: nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Metrics: VMs count, Users count, Wall time (hours), Distribution by wall time, project, project leader, and institution, and systems

Histogram

Summary (Monthly)

Average Monthly Usage Data (Wall time, Launched VMs, Users)
Figure 1: Average monthly usage data (wall time (hour), launched VMs, users)
This mixed chart represents average monthly usage as to wall time (hour), the number of VM instances and active users.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013

  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus

  • Hostname: sierra

  • Metric:
    • Runtime (Wall time hours): Sum of time elapsed from launch to termination of VM instances
    • Count (VM count): The number of launched VM instances
    • User count (Active): The number of users who launched VMs

Summary (Daily)

Users count (daily)
Figure 2: Users count
This time series chart represents daily active user count for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count (daily)
Figure 3: VMs count
This time series chart represents the number of daily launched VM instances for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
Wall time (hours, daily)
Figure 4: Wall time (hours)
This time series chart represents daily wall time (hours) for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra

Distribution

VM count by wall time
Figure 5: VM count by wall time
This chart illustrates usage patterns of VM instances in terms of running wall time.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project
Figure 6: VMs count by project
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project groups. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project
Project Value
fg-174:RAIN: FutureGrid Dynamic provisioning Framework 824
fg-40:Inca 227
fg-224:Nimbus Auto Scale 222
fg-172:Cloud-TM 113
fg-54:Investigating cloud computing as a solution for analyzing particle physics data 93
fg-168:Next Generation Sequencing in the Cloud 41
fg-362:Course: Cloud Computing and Storage (UF) 39
fg-389:Investigating the Apache Big Data Stack 38
fg-10:TeraGrid XD TIS(Technology Insertion Service) Technology Evaluation Laboratory 30
fg-82:FG General Software Development 14
fg-367:Optimize rapid deployment and updating of VM images at the remote compute cluster 14
fg-355:Course: Data Center Scale Computing Class 14
fg-334:Tutorial on Cloud Computing and Software-defined Networking 10
fg-384:Graph/network analysis Resource manager 10
fg-341:Course: Parallel Computing 6
fg-374:Course: Cloud and Distributed Computing 6
fg-97:FutureGrid and Grid‘5000 Collaboration 6
fg-363:Course: Applied Cyberinfrastructure concepts 6
fg-233:CINET - A Cyber-Infrastructure for Network Science 5
fg-364:Course: EEL6871 Autonomic Computing 5
fg-369:Testing of Network Facing Services for the Open Science Grid 4
fg-380:FutureGrid Support for BigData MOOC 4
fg-264:Course: 1st Workshop on bioKepler Tools and Its Applications 4
fg-382:Reliability Analysis using Hadoop and MapReduce 4
fg-215:FuturGrid Directory Entry 4
fg-371:Characterizing Infrastructure Cloud Performance for Scientific Computing 3
fg-243:Applied Cyberinfrastructure concepts 3
fg-1:Peer-to-peer overlay networks and applications in virtual networks and virtual clusters 1
fg-175:GridProphet, A workflow execution time prediction system for the Grid 1
fg-316:Course: Cloud Computing Class - third edition 1
VMs count by project leader
Figure 7: VMs count by project leader
This chart also illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project Leader. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project leader
Projectleader Value
Gregor von Laszewski 842
Shava Smallen 227
Pierre Riteau 222
Paolo Romano 113
Randall Sobie 93
Jonathan Klinginsmith 41
Andy Li 39
ibrahim hallac 38
John Lockman 30
Dirk Grunwald 14
Jan Balewski 14
Jose Fortes 10
Tirtha Bhattacharjee 10
Nirav Merchant 9
Philip Rhodes 6
Mauricio Tsugawa 6
Wilson Rivera 6
Keith Bisset 5
Meng Han 5
Ilkay Altintas 4
Igor Sfiligoi 4
Carl Walasek 4
Abhilash Koppula 4
Theron Voran 3
Massimo Canonico 1
Thomas Fahringer 1
Renato Figueiredo 1
VMs count by institution
Figure 8: VMs count by institution
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by Institution. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by institution
Institution Value
Indiana University 883
UC San Diego 227
University of Chicago 222
INESC ID 113
University of Victoria 93
University of Florida, Department of Electrical and Computer Eng 39
Firat University, Computer Science Department 38
University of Texas at Austin 30
Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Computer Science 14
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Nuclear Sc 14
Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institut 10
University of Florida, Advanced Computing and Information System 10
University of Florida 7
University of Mississippi, Department of Computer Science 6
University of Puerto Rico, Electrical and Computer Emgineering D 6
University of Arizona, Arizona Research Laboratories, School of 6
University of Florida, ACIS 5
Virginia Tech 5
University of the Sciences , Mathematics, Physics, and Statistic 4
University of California San Diego, Physics Department 4
Indiana University, Community Grids Lab 4
UCSD 4
University of Arizona 3
University of Colorado at Boulder, Computer Science Department 3
University of Innsbruck 1
University of Piemonte Orientale, Computer Science Department 1
Wall time (hours) by project leader
Figure 9: Wall time (hours) by project leader
This chart illustrates proportionate total run times by project leader.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra

System information

System information shows utilization distribution as to VMs count and wall time. Each cluster represents a compute node.

VMs count by systems in Cluster (sierra)
Figure 10: VMs count by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (sierra)
This column chart represents VMs count among systems.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
Wall time (hours) by systems in Cluster (sierra)
Figure 11: Wall time (hours) by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (sierra)
This column chart represents wall time among systems.
  • Period: November 01 – November 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra