FutureGrid Cloud Metric FutureGrid

Cloud Metric

Table Of Contents

Previous topic

Usage Report sierra

Next topic

Usage Report hotel

This Page

Usage Report india

  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Hostname: india.futuregrid.org
  • Services: openstack, eucalyptus
  • Metrics: VMs count, Users count, Wall time (hours), Distribution by wall time, project, project leader, and institution, and systems

Histogram

Summary (Monthly)

Average Monthly Usage Data (Wall time, Launched VMs, Users)
Figure 1: Average monthly usage data (wall time (hour), launched VMs, users)
This mixed chart represents average monthly usage as to wall time (hour), the number of VM instances and active users.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013

  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus

  • Hostname: india

  • Metric:
    • Runtime (Wall time hours): Sum of time elapsed from launch to termination of VM instances
    • Count (VM count): The number of launched VM instances
    • User count (Active): The number of users who launched VMs

Summary (Daily)

Users count (daily)
Figure 2: Users count
This time series chart represents daily active user count for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india
VMs count (daily)
Figure 3: VMs count
This time series chart represents the number of daily launched VM instances for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india
Wall time (hours, daily)
Figure 4: Wall time (hours)
This time series chart represents daily wall time (hours) for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india

Distribution

VM count by wall time
Figure 5: VM count by wall time
This chart illustrates usage patterns of VM instances in terms of running wall time.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india
VMs count by project
Figure 6: VMs count by project
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project groups. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india
VMs count by project
Project Value
fg-172:Cloud-TM 828
fg-143:Course: Cloud Computing for Data Intensive Science Class 203
fg-3:Survey of Open-Source Cloud Infrastructure using FutureGrid Testbed 60
fg-316:Course: Cloud Computing Class - third edition 50
fg-1:Peer-to-peer overlay networks and applications in virtual networks and virtual clusters 38
fg-82:FG General Software Development 27
fg-42:SAGA 24
fg-179:GPCloud: Cloud-based Automatic Repair of Real-World Software Bugs 21
fg-97:FutureGrid and Grid‘5000 Collaboration 17
fg-54:Investigating cloud computing as a solution for analyzing particle physics data 13
fg-213:Course: Cloud Computing class - second edition 8
Others 8
fg-253:Characterizing Performance of Infrastructure Clouds 8
fg-241:Course: Science Cloud Summer School 2012 2
fg-60:Wide area distributed file system for MapReduce applications on FutureGrid platform 2
fg-136:JGC-DataCloud-2012 paper experiments 1
VMs count by project leader
Figure 7: VMs count by project leader
This chart also illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project Leader. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india
VMs count by project leader
Projectleader Value
Paolo Romano 828
Judy Qiu 203
Tak-Lon Wu 60
Massimo Canonico 58
Renato Figueiredo 38
Gregor von Laszewski 29
Shantenu Jha 24
Claire Le Goues 21
Mauricio Tsugawa 17
Randall Sobie 13
Others 8
Paul Marshall 8
Lizhe Wang 2
Mats Rynge 1
VMs count by institution
Figure 8: VMs count by institution
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by Institution. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india
VMs count by institution
Institution Value
INESC ID 828
Indiana University 294
University of Florida 55
University of Piemonte Orientale, Computer Science Department 50
Louisiana State University 24
University of Virginia 21
University of Victoria 13
University of Piemonte Orientale 8
Others 8
University of Colorado at Boulder 8
USC 1
Wall time (hours) by project leader
Figure 9: Wall time (hours) by project leader
This chart illustrates proportionate total run times by project leader.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india

System information

System information shows utilization distribution as to VMs count and wall time. Each cluster represents a compute node.

VMs count by systems in Cluster (india)
Figure 10: VMs count by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (india)
This column chart represents VMs count among systems.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india
Wall time (hours) by systems in Cluster (india)
Figure 11: Wall time (hours) by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (india)
This column chart represents wall time among systems.
  • Period: September 01 – September 30, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: india