FutureGrid Cloud Metric FutureGrid

Cloud Metric

Table Of Contents

Previous topic

Summary Report (All)

Next topic

Usage Report india

This Page

Usage Report sierra

  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Hostname: sierra.futuregrid.org
  • Services: nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Metrics: VMs count, Users count, Wall time (hours), Distribution by wall time, project, project leader, and institution, and systems

Histogram

Summary (Monthly)

Average Monthly Usage Data (Wall time, Launched VMs, Users)
Figure 1: Average monthly usage data (wall time (hour), launched VMs, users)
This mixed chart represents average monthly usage as to wall time (hour), the number of VM instances and active users.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014

  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus

  • Hostname: sierra

  • Metric:
    • Runtime (Wall time hours): Sum of time elapsed from launch to termination of VM instances
    • Count (VM count): The number of launched VM instances
    • User count (Active): The number of users who launched VMs

Summary (Daily)

Users count (daily)
Figure 2: Users count
This time series chart represents daily active user count for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count (daily)
Figure 3: VMs count
This time series chart represents the number of daily launched VM instances for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
Wall time (hours, daily)
Figure 4: Wall time (hours)
This time series chart represents daily wall time (hours) for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra

Distribution

VM count by wall time
Figure 5: VM count by wall time
This chart illustrates usage patterns of VM instances in terms of running wall time.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project
Figure 6: VMs count by project
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project groups. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project
Project Value
fg-40:Inca 240
fg-362:Course: Cloud Computing and Storage (UF) 126
fg-172:Cloud-TM 101
fg-54:Investigating cloud computing as a solution for analyzing particle physics data 97
fg-82:FG General Software Development 80
fg-389:Investigating the Apache Big Data Stack 20
fg-384:Graph/network analysis Resource manager 18
fg-1:Peer-to-peer overlay networks and applications in virtual networks and virtual clusters 16
fg-371:Characterizing Infrastructure Cloud Performance for Scientific Computing 14
fg-367:Optimize rapid deployment and updating of VM images at the remote compute cluster 9
fg-382:Reliability Analysis using Hadoop and MapReduce 9
fg-10:TeraGrid XD TIS(Technology Insertion Service) Technology Evaluation Laboratory 8
fg-175:GridProphet, A workflow execution time prediction system for the Grid 7
fg-298:FRIEDA: Flexible Robust Intelligent Elastic Data Management 4
fg-136:JGC-DataCloud-2012 paper experiments 3
fg-316:Course: Cloud Computing Class - third edition 2
VMs count by project leader
Figure 7: VMs count by project leader
This chart also illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project Leader. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project leader
Projectleader Value
Shava Smallen 240
Andy Li 126
Paolo Romano 101
Randall Sobie 97
Gregor von Laszewski 80
ibrahim hallac 20
Tirtha Bhattacharjee 18
Renato Figueiredo 16
Theron Voran 14
Carl Walasek 9
Jan Balewski 9
John Lockman 8
Thomas Fahringer 7
Lavanya Ramakrishnan 4
Mats Rynge 3
Massimo Canonico 2
VMs count by institution
Figure 8: VMs count by institution
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by Institution. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by institution
Institution Value
UC San Diego 240
University of Florida, Department of Electrical and Computer Eng 126
INESC ID 101
University of Victoria 97
Indiana University 80
Firat University, Computer Science Department 20
Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institut 18
University of Florida 16
University of Colorado at Boulder, Computer Science Department 14
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Nuclear Sc 9
University of the Sciences , Mathematics, Physics, and Statistic 9
University of Texas at Austin 8
University of Innsbruck 7
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab 4
USC 3
University of Piemonte Orientale, Computer Science Department 2
Wall time (hours) by project leader
Figure 9: Wall time (hours) by project leader
This chart illustrates proportionate total run times by project leader.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra

System information

System information shows utilization distribution as to VMs count and wall time. Each cluster represents a compute node.

VMs count by systems in Cluster (sierra)
Figure 10: VMs count by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (sierra)
This column chart represents VMs count among systems.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
Wall time (hours) by systems in Cluster (sierra)
Figure 11: Wall time (hours) by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (sierra)
This column chart represents wall time among systems.
  • Period: January 01 – January 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra