FutureGrid Cloud Metric FutureGrid

Cloud Metric

Table Of Contents

Previous topic

Summary Report (All)

Next topic

Usage Report india

This Page

Usage Report sierra

  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Hostname: sierra.futuregrid.org
  • Services: nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Metrics: VMs count, Users count, Wall time (hours), Distribution by wall time, project, project leader, and institution, and systems

Histogram

Summary (Monthly)

Average Monthly Usage Data (Wall time, Launched VMs, Users)
Figure 1: Average monthly usage data (wall time (hour), launched VMs, users)
This mixed chart represents average monthly usage as to wall time (hour), the number of VM instances and active users.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014

  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus

  • Hostname: sierra

  • Metric:
    • Runtime (Wall time hours): Sum of time elapsed from launch to termination of VM instances
    • Count (VM count): The number of launched VM instances
    • User count (Active): The number of users who launched VMs

Summary (Daily)

Users count (daily)
Figure 2: Users count
This time series chart represents daily active user count for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count (daily)
Figure 3: VMs count
This time series chart represents the number of daily launched VM instances for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
Wall time (hours, daily)
Figure 4: Wall time (hours)
This time series chart represents daily wall time (hours) for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra

Distribution

VM count by wall time
Figure 5: VM count by wall time
This chart illustrates usage patterns of VM instances in terms of running wall time.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project
Figure 6: VMs count by project
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project groups. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project
Project Value
fg-298:FRIEDA: Flexible Robust Intelligent Elastic Data Management 250
fg-367:Optimize rapid deployment and updating of VM images at the remote compute cluster 150
fg-371:Characterizing Infrastructure Cloud Performance for Scientific Computing 133
fg-174:RAIN: FutureGrid Dynamic provisioning Framework 113
fg-54:Investigating cloud computing as a solution for analyzing particle physics data 41
fg-224:Nimbus Auto Scale 37
fg-40:Inca 30
fg-1:Peer-to-peer overlay networks and applications in virtual networks and virtual clusters 16
fg-172:Cloud-TM 15
fg-389:Investigating the Apache Big Data Stack 14
fg-244:Course: Data Center Scale Computing 10
fg-165:The VIEW Project 10
fg-384:Graph/network analysis Resource manager 8
fg-372:Mobile Device Computation Offloading over SocialVPNs 8
fg-362:Course: Cloud Computing and Storage (UF) 8
fg-175:GridProphet, A workflow execution time prediction system for the Grid 3
fg-316:Course: Cloud Computing Class - third edition 2
fg-82:FG General Software Development 2
VMs count by project leader
Figure 7: VMs count by project leader
This chart also illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project Leader. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project leader
Projectleader Value
Lavanya Ramakrishnan 250
Jan Balewski 150
Theron Voran 133
Gregor von Laszewski 115
Randall Sobie 41
Pierre Riteau 37
Shava Smallen 30
Renato Figueiredo 24
Paolo Romano 15
ibrahim hallac 14
Dirk Grunwald 10
Shiyong Lu 10
Tirtha Bhattacharjee 8
Andy Li 8
Thomas Fahringer 3
Massimo Canonico 2
VMs count by institution
Figure 8: VMs count by institution
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by Institution. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by institution
Institution Value
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab 250
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Nuclear Sc 150
University of Colorado at Boulder, Computer Science Department 133
Indiana University 115
University of Victoria 41
University of Chicago 37
UC San Diego 30
University of Florida 16
INESC ID 15
Firat University, Computer Science Department 14
Wayne State University 10
Univ. of Colorado 10
University of Florida, Electrical and Computer Engineering 8
University of Florida, Department of Electrical and Computer Eng 8
Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institut 8
University of Innsbruck 3
University of Piemonte Orientale, Computer Science Department 2
Wall time (hours) by project leader
Figure 9: Wall time (hours) by project leader
This chart illustrates proportionate total run times by project leader.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra

System information

System information shows utilization distribution as to VMs count and wall time. Each cluster represents a compute node.

VMs count by systems in Cluster (sierra)
Figure 10: VMs count by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (sierra)
This column chart represents VMs count among systems.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
Wall time (hours) by systems in Cluster (sierra)
Figure 11: Wall time (hours) by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (sierra)
This column chart represents wall time among systems.
  • Period: March 01 – March 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra