FutureGrid Cloud Metric FutureGrid

Cloud Metric

Table Of Contents

Previous topic

Usage Report india

Next topic

Usage Report alamo

This Page

Usage Report hotel

  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Hostname: hotel.futuregrid.org
  • Services: nimbus
  • Metrics: VMs count, Users count, Wall time (hours), Distribution by wall time, project, project leader, and institution, and systems

Histogram

Summary (Monthly)

Average Monthly Usage Data (Wall time, Launched VMs, Users)
Figure 1: Average monthly usage data (wall time (hour), launched VMs, users)
This mixed chart represents average monthly usage as to wall time (hour), the number of VM instances and active users.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014

  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus

  • Hostname: hotel

  • Metric:
    • Runtime (Wall time hours): Sum of time elapsed from launch to termination of VM instances
    • Count (VM count): The number of launched VM instances
    • User count (Active): The number of users who launched VMs

Summary (Daily)

Users count (daily)
Figure 2: Users count
This time series chart represents daily active user count for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count (daily)
Figure 3: VMs count
This time series chart represents the number of daily launched VM instances for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
Wall time (hours, daily)
Figure 4: Wall time (hours)
This time series chart represents daily wall time (hours) for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel

Distribution

VM count by wall time
Figure 5: VM count by wall time
This chart illustrates usage patterns of VM instances in terms of running wall time.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count by project
Figure 6: VMs count by project
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project groups. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count by project
Project Value
fg-54:Investigating cloud computing as a solution for analyzing particle physics data 298
fg-314:User-friendly tools to play with cloud platforms 60
fg-418:Course: Cloud Computing Class - fourth edition 45
fg-97:FutureGrid and Grid‘5000 Collaboration 31
fg-217:Cloud Computing In Education 25
fg-82:FG General Software Development 23
fg-367:Optimize rapid deployment and updating of VM images at the remote compute cluster 22
fg-13:FutureGrid Systems Development and Prototyping 18
fg-257:Particle Physics Data analysis cluster for ATLAS LHC experiment 11
fg-9:Distributed Execution of Kepler Scientific Workflow on Future Grid 10
fg-224:Nimbus Auto Scale 5
fg-150:SC11: Using and Building Infrastructure Clouds for Science 3
fg-341:Course: Parallel Computing 3
fg-394:Hydroinformatics on the Cloud 3
fg-42:SAGA 2
fg-213:Course: Cloud Computing class - second edition 2
VMs count by project leader
Figure 7: VMs count by project leader
This chart also illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project Leader. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count by project leader
Projectleader Value
Randall Sobie 298
Massimo Canonico 107
Mauricio Tsugawa 31
Željko Šeremet 25
Gregor von Laszewski 23
Jan Balewski 22
Sharif Islam 18
Doug Benjamin 11
Ilkay Altintas 10
Pierre Riteau 5
John Bresnahan 3
Wilson Rivera 3
Kate Keahey 3
Shantenu Jha 2
VMs count by institution
Figure 8: VMs count by institution
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by Institution. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count by institution
Institution Value
University of Victoria 298
University of Piemonte Orientale, Computer Science Department 105
Indiana University 41
University of Florida 31
University of Mostar 25
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Nuclear Sc 22
Duke University 11
UCSD 10
University of Chicago 5
University of Chicago, Computation Institute 3
Nimbus 3
University of Puerto Rico, Electrical and Computer Emgineering D 3
Louisiana State University 2
University of Piemonte Orientale 2
Wall time (hours) by project leader
Figure 9: Wall time (hours) by project leader
This chart illustrates proportionate total run times by project leader.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel

System information

System information shows utilization distribution as to VMs count and wall time. Each cluster represents a compute node.

VMs count by systems in Cluster (hotel)
Figure 10: VMs count by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (hotel)
This column chart represents VMs count among systems.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
Wall time (hours) by systems in Cluster (hotel)
Figure 11: Wall time (hours) by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (hotel)
This column chart represents wall time among systems.
  • Period: May 01 – May 31, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel