FutureGrid Cloud Metric FutureGrid

Cloud Metric

Table Of Contents

Previous topic

Usage Report india

Next topic

Usage Report alamo

This Page

Usage Report hotel

  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Hostname: hotel.futuregrid.org
  • Services: nimbus
  • Metrics: VMs count, Users count, Wall time (hours), Distribution by wall time, project, project leader, and institution, and systems

Histogram

Summary (Monthly)

Average Monthly Usage Data (Wall time, Launched VMs, Users)
Figure 1: Average monthly usage data (wall time (hour), launched VMs, users)
This mixed chart represents average monthly usage as to wall time (hour), the number of VM instances and active users.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013

  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus

  • Hostname: hotel

  • Metric:
    • Runtime (Wall time hours): Sum of time elapsed from launch to termination of VM instances
    • Count (VM count): The number of launched VM instances
    • User count (Active): The number of users who launched VMs

Summary (Daily)

Users count (daily)
Figure 2: Users count
This time series chart represents daily active user count for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count (daily)
Figure 3: VMs count
This time series chart represents the number of daily launched VM instances for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
Wall time (hours, daily)
Figure 4: Wall time (hours)
This time series chart represents daily wall time (hours) for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel

Distribution

VM count by wall time
Figure 5: VM count by wall time
This chart illustrates usage patterns of VM instances in terms of running wall time.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count by project
Figure 6: VMs count by project
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project groups. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count by project
Project Value
fg-82:FG General Software Development 138
fg-224:Nimbus Auto Scale 47
fg-54:Investigating cloud computing as a solution for analyzing particle physics data 32
fg-364:Course: EEL6871 Autonomic Computing 22
fg-213:Course: Cloud Computing class - second edition 7
fg-340:Research: Parallel Computing for Machine Learning 6
fg-362:Course: Cloud Computing and Storage (UF) 5
fg-371:Characterizing Infrastructure Cloud Performance for Scientific Computing 3
fg-391:Topics in Parallel Computation 2
fg-201:ExTENCI Testing, Validation, and Performance 1
fg-97:FutureGrid and Grid‘5000 Collaboration 1
fg-10:TeraGrid XD TIS(Technology Insertion Service) Technology Evaluation Laboratory 1
VMs count by project leader
Figure 7: VMs count by project leader
This chart also illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project Leader. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count by project leader
Projectleader Value
Gregor von Laszewski 138
Pierre Riteau 47
Randall Sobie 32
Meng Han 22
Massimo Canonico 7
Wilson Rivera 6
Andy Li 5
Theron Voran 3
Heru Suhartanto 2
Mauricio Tsugawa 1
John Lockman 1
Preston Smith 1
VMs count by institution
Figure 8: VMs count by institution
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by Institution. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
VMs count by institution
Institution Value
Indiana University 138
University of Chicago 47
University of Victoria 32
University of Florida, ACIS 22
University of Piemonte Orientale 7
University of Puerto Rico, Electrical and Computer Emgineering D 6
University of Florida, Department of Electrical and Computer Eng 5
University of Colorado at Boulder, Computer Science Department 3
Universitas Indonesia, Faculty of Computer Science 2
University of Texas at Austin 1
Purdue University 1
University of Florida 1
Wall time (hours) by project leader
Figure 9: Wall time (hours) by project leader
This chart illustrates proportionate total run times by project leader.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel

System information

System information shows utilization distribution as to VMs count and wall time. Each cluster represents a compute node.

VMs count by systems in Cluster (hotel)
Figure 10: VMs count by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (hotel)
This column chart represents VMs count among systems.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel
Wall time (hours) by systems in Cluster (hotel)
Figure 11: Wall time (hours) by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (hotel)
This column chart represents wall time among systems.
  • Period: December 01 – December 23, 2013
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus
  • Hostname: hotel