FutureGrid Cloud Metric FutureGrid

Cloud Metric

Table Of Contents

Previous topic

Summary Report (All)

Next topic

Usage Report india

This Page

Usage Report sierra

  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Hostname: sierra.futuregrid.org
  • Services: nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Metrics: VMs count, Users count, Wall time (hours), Distribution by wall time, project, project leader, and institution, and systems

Histogram

Summary (Monthly)

Average Monthly Usage Data (Wall time, Launched VMs, Users)
Figure 1: Average monthly usage data (wall time (hour), launched VMs, users)
This mixed chart represents average monthly usage as to wall time (hour), the number of VM instances and active users.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014

  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus

  • Hostname: sierra

  • Metric:
    • Runtime (Wall time hours): Sum of time elapsed from launch to termination of VM instances
    • Count (VM count): The number of launched VM instances
    • User count (Active): The number of users who launched VMs

Summary (Daily)

Users count (daily)
Figure 2: Users count
This time series chart represents daily active user count for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count (daily)
Figure 3: VMs count
This time series chart represents the number of daily launched VM instances for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
Wall time (hours, daily)
Figure 4: Wall time (hours)
This time series chart represents daily wall time (hours) for cloud services and shows historical changes during the period.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra

Distribution

VM count by wall time
Figure 5: VM count by wall time
This chart illustrates usage patterns of VM instances in terms of running wall time.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project
Figure 6: VMs count by project
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project groups. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project
Project Value
fg-174:RAIN: FutureGrid Dynamic provisioning Framework 1069
fg-40:Inca 848
fg-54:Investigating cloud computing as a solution for analyzing particle physics data 426
fg-298:FRIEDA: Flexible Robust Intelligent Elastic Data Management 337
fg-371:Characterizing Infrastructure Cloud Performance for Scientific Computing 219
fg-367:Optimize rapid deployment and updating of VM images at the remote compute cluster 218
fg-362:Course: Cloud Computing and Storage (UF) 168
fg-172:Cloud-TM 158
fg-82:FG General Software Development 142
fg-224:Nimbus Auto Scale 138
fg-389:Investigating the Apache Big Data Stack 108
fg-384:Graph/network analysis Resource manager 56
fg-355:Course: Data Center Scale Computing Class 54
fg-1:Peer-to-peer overlay networks and applications in virtual networks and virtual clusters 48
fg-10:TeraGrid XD TIS(Technology Insertion Service) Technology Evaluation Laboratory 40
fg-168:Next Generation Sequencing in the Cloud 37
fg-165:The VIEW Project 31
fg-363:Course: Applied Cyberinfrastructure concepts 21
fg-175:GridProphet, A workflow execution time prediction system for the Grid 16
fg-214:Mining Interactions between Network Community Structure and Information Diffusion 15
fg-374:Course: Cloud and Distributed Computing 15
fg-382:Reliability Analysis using Hadoop and MapReduce 12
fg-372:Mobile Device Computation Offloading over SocialVPNs 12
fg-244:Course: Data Center Scale Computing 10
fg-341:Course: Parallel Computing 6
fg-404:Enhancing Usage of cloud Infrastructure 6
fg-316:Course: Cloud Computing Class - third edition 6
fg-233:CINET - A Cyber-Infrastructure for Network Science 5
fg-364:Course: EEL6871 Autonomic Computing 5
fg-97:FutureGrid and Grid‘5000 Collaboration 4
fg-243:Applied Cyberinfrastructure concepts 3
fg-136:JGC-DataCloud-2012 paper experiments 3
fg-264:Course: 1st Workshop on bioKepler Tools and Its Applications 2
fg-340:Research: Parallel Computing for Machine Learning 1
VMs count by project leader
Figure 7: VMs count by project leader
This chart also illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by project Leader. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by project leader
Projectleader Value
Gregor von Laszewski 1211
Shava Smallen 848
Randall Sobie 426
Lavanya Ramakrishnan 337
Theron Voran 219
Jan Balewski 218
Andy Li 168
Paolo Romano 158
Pierre Riteau 138
ibrahim hallac 108
Dirk Grunwald 64
Renato Figueiredo 60
Tirtha Bhattacharjee 56
John Lockman 40
Jonathan Klinginsmith 37
Shiyong Lu 31
Nirav Merchant 24
Thomas Fahringer 16
Philip Rhodes 15
Yong-Yeol Ahn 15
Carl Walasek 12
Wilson Rivera 7
Massimo Canonico 6
Rahul Limbole 6
Keith Bisset 5
Meng Han 5
Mauricio Tsugawa 4
Mats Rynge 3
Ilkay Altintas 2
VMs count by institution
Figure 8: VMs count by institution
This chart illustrates the proportion of launched VM instances by Institution. The same data in tabular form follows.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
VMs count by institution
Institution Value
Indiana University 1263
UC San Diego 848
University of Victoria 426
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab 337
University of Colorado at Boulder, Computer Science Department 219
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Nuclear Sc 218
University of Florida, Department of Electrical and Computer Eng 168
INESC ID 158
University of Chicago 138
Firat University, Computer Science Department 108
Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institut 56
Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Computer Science 54
University of Florida 52
University of Texas at Austin 40
Wayne State University 31
University of Arizona, Arizona Research Laboratories, School of 21
University of Innsbruck 16
University of Mississippi, Department of Computer Science 15
University of Florida, Electrical and Computer Engineering 12
University of the Sciences , Mathematics, Physics, and Statistic 12
Univ. of Colorado 10
University of Puerto Rico, Electrical and Computer Emgineering D 7
Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute Mumbai, Computer Scienc 6
University of Piemonte Orientale, Computer Science Department 6
University of Florida, ACIS 5
Virginia Tech 5
USC 3
University of Arizona 3
UCSD 2
Wall time (hours) by project leader
Figure 9: Wall time (hours) by project leader
This chart illustrates proportionate total run times by project leader.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra

System information

System information shows utilization distribution as to VMs count and wall time. Each cluster represents a compute node.

VMs count by systems in Cluster (sierra)
Figure 10: VMs count by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (sierra)
This column chart represents VMs count among systems.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra
Wall time (hours) by systems in Cluster (sierra)
Figure 11: Wall time (hours) by systems (compute nodes) in Cluster (sierra)
This column chart represents wall time among systems.
  • Period: November 13 – May 13, 2014
  • Cloud(IaaS): nimbus, openstack, eucalyptus
  • Hostname: sierra